The need for fundamental transformation in our health systems has never been more apparent. Already the world faces a shortage of 13 million health workers. Now, in the context of COVID-19, our dependencies on a stretched health workforce are brought to the fore, demanding creative, urgent, and difficult solutions.
People are asked to steer clear of COVID-19 hotspots such as hospitals and clinics, to use telemedicine or hotlines where they exist, to self-diagnose using symptom guidelines, and to self-medicate. Preventative and curative care jostle together, both equally important, both challenged to be delivered in tandem. World over, millions volunteered almost overnight to support continuity of health services, with clinicians coming out of retirement, and others lending their non-clinical expertise and labor. At individual, community, and health system levels, we are witnessing an overnight transformation in how people use and organize healthcare.
These measures are both to protect heroic frontline health workers, but also to ensure the most effective healthcare can be provided at scale. In this context, self-care is not only occurring, but has rapidly become a critical answer in the health system response to COVID-19.
For the uninitiated, the World Health Organization (WHO) defines self-care as “the ability of individuals, families and communities to promote health, prevent disease, maintain health, and cope with illness and disability with or without the support of a healthcare provider,” and add in subsequent publications that “self-care interventions are among the most promising and exciting new approaches to improve health and well-being, both from a health systems perspective and for people who use these interventions.”
Prior to COVID-19, self-care was already increasing in relevance for health systems. This is not self-care focused on general physical and mental wellness, although self-care does incorporate those broader and important considerations. This is self-care in the form of drugs, diagnostics, devices, and digital health, that—paired with growing demand by individuals for participation in their healthcare—has led to a greater configuration of self-led health care possibilities than ever before. Information, products, and services previously requiring the full participation of health workers have seen individuals take greater responsibility for their health care. Examples of this abound across the range of self-management, self-testing, and self-awareness (see Figure 1).
Prior to the outbreak of COVID-19, health systems from Uganda and Nigeria were working on plans to take the 2019 WHO Consolidated Guideline for Self-Care Interventions in Health for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights and other self-care interventions to scale. This specific WHO guideline recognizes that many evidence-based practices within the SRHR space could be promoted to enhance self-care, and recommends measures such as HIV self-testing, HPV self-sampling, and self-administered injectable contraception all be available at scale.
Within a COVID-19 response, self-care is how we help one another, and what keeps our health systems from complete collapse. It appears in our efforts to self-screen through AI-powered websites where we check how common our symptoms are in relation to COVID-19, or in those WHO WhatsApp alerts used to self-educate. It’s the promise of home self-testing (tantalizingly close), and all we do to care for ourselves and our household when someone falls ill.
This sudden and rapid reliance on self-care isn’t how we imagined it—haphazard and driven out of crisis rather than thoughtful health system design. There will be people now managing their health in ways that they should not, cannot, be expected to do alone. In this messiness exist dangers and pitfalls, such as the general public and physicians purchasing and using chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine after recent reports suggested they may be able to treat COVID-19, but with insufficient evidence or reflection on the consequences. The safeguards (financial protection, safe and quality care, adequate support from a health worker when needed) have not been fully established.
But crises don’t wait for us to get it right, as much as they reveal how previously we could have done things differently, better. This leaves us in a transitional moment, where the rapid transformation happening cannot be ignored. Within the lens of outbreak response itself, self-care plays an important function. Self-care will also remain important for the many healthcare needs that carry on regardless of COVID-19. And it will play a critical role in the health systems that exist once the pandemic has subsided.
Self-care can mean better, more accessible, participatory, affordable, quality healthcare. In the case of the emergency contraceptive pill or acetaminophen when available over the counter, such self-care will require minimal or no interaction with a health worker. However, frequently, for COVID-19 and many health interventions, self-care requires a carefully choreographed set of interactions between health workers and individuals to enable people to take greater control over their healthcare.
As the WHO guidelines also highlight, self-care is not a binary phenomenon of healthcare worker versus person-led healthcare, rather it’s far more dynamic. For example, the HIV self-test may be taken alone but requires referral into the health system for result verification and treatment, if needed. HPV DNA self-sampling allows a woman the control and privacy to collect her own specimens for screening for cervical cancer, but the health system will review the results and assist clients to interpret and act on them, including treatment when applicable. Self-injected DMPA-SC and oral PrEP for HIV prevention might require an initial contact with a pharmacist, clinician, or lay health worker, but are largely used autonomously thereafter—with support provided at intervals to counsel through any adverse effects and adapt regimens or switch methods as needed. The nature of these interactions will vary by intervention, by population, and across people’s lifetimes.
During the COVID-19 outbreak and beyond, a health system that optimized self-care would therefore consider the following:
Self-care, enabling people’s own capacity to do what once relied on healthcare workers, would have been one part of the future of healthcare regardless of COVID-19. But to navigate COVID-19 and come out with health systems and public health capacities that are stronger—not further fragmented—it’s increasingly important to find the balance between self-care and what we rely on healthcare workers and health systems to deliver. To the extent possible, documenting and reflecting on this rapid transformation will also be crucial to learning from this. And if there is one ray of hope in challenging times, it is that through necessity, quality self-care may become better organized, resourced, and applied. People, together, can do this.
This work is co-authored by staff from PSI and Jhpiego. Both organizations are rapidly employing existing and new resources to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as ensure existing health system capacity is maintained in critical health areas. Through the Self Care Trailblazers Group, generously supported by the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (UK) and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, both PSI and Jhpiego benefit from the collective wisdom and momentum of many organizations working in self-care at global and country level, from FHI 360, PATH, White Ribbon Alliance, IPPF, the Self Care Academic Research Unit at Imperial College London, Johns Hopkins University, SH:24, EngenderHealth, Aidsfonds, Voluntary Service Overseas (VSO) and many others. The technical leadership and support of the World Health Organization has also been vitally important to strengthening the emerging self-care movement, alongside the growing support from the USAID Office of Population & Reproductive Health, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK Department for International Development.