Tẹ lati wa

Awọn ọna kika Akoko kika: 6 iseju

Eto AYSRH Olona-Abala—Kini Nṣiṣẹ, Kini Ko ṣe, Kini idi ti o ṣe pataki

Atunṣe ti Akori Awọn ibaraẹnisọrọ sisopọ 5, Session Two

Ni Oṣu Kẹwa 28, Aṣeyọri Imọ ati FP2030 gbalejo igba keji ni eto awọn ijiroro ikẹhin wa ninu jara Awọn ibaraẹnisọrọ Asopọmọra. Ninu igba yii, agbohunsoke ṣawari awọn agbara, awọn italaya, and lessons learned in implementing multi-sectoral programming in AYSRH and why multi-sectoral approaches are key to rethinking AYSRH service provision.

Ti padanu igba yii? Ka akopọ ni isalẹ tabi wọle si awọn gbigbasilẹ (ninu English tabi Faranse).

Awọn agbohunsoke ifihan:

  • Andrea Padilla, program manager at International Youth Foundation (IYF).
  • Josaphat Mshighati, regional technical advisor for East and Southern Africa—Women’s led Climate Resilience at Pathfinder International.
  • Metsehate Ayenekulu, AYSRH Program Director at Population Services International, Ethiopia.
  • Sia Nowrojee, senior director of Global Community at Girl Up of the United Nations Foundation, acted as the moderator for this discussion.
Clockwise from top right: Sia Nowrojee (moderator), Andrea Padilla, Metsehate Ayenekulu, Josaphat Mshighati.
Clockwise from top right: Sia Nowrojee (oniwontunniwonsi), Andrea Padilla, Metsehate Ayenekulu, Josaphat Mshighati.

Based on your own experience working across sectors, what does multi-sectoral programming mean to you?

Wo ni bayi: 13:53

Speakers discussed the importance of using a holistic approach within multi-sectoral programming, sharing stories from within their respective sectors. Ayenekulu emphasized that effective multi-sectoral collaboration requires considering young people as actors and decision-makers, rather than simply treating them as users of a given program. She explained that young people and adolescents must be centered in the design process, as they are experts regarding the issues facing them. Padilla highlighted several necessities for effective collaboration: clearly identifying the issues that need to be addressed within the target population, understanding one’s own role in the system surrounding that issue, and discovering other strategic stakeholders in that system. She explained that multi-sectoral programming requires systems thinking, as programs must address the broader set of challenges and circumstances that undermine youth potential. Mshighati echoed the sentiments of the other speakers, commenting that through analysis of human and community needs, it is clear they are interconnected and must be addressed with this in mind.

“Multi-sectoral collaboration calls for considering [odo awon eniyan] as main actors, as decision-makers in their life, as experts of their own issues, rather than considering them as mere beneficiaries.”

Metsehate Ayenekulu

Who are some of the key stakeholders that need to be involved in multi-sectoral programming? What are some of the key entry points for bringing sectors together?

Wo ni bayi: 26:17

Mshighati explained that engaging key beneficiaries is critical to implementing and enhancing multi-sectoral programming. He described how young people in the community are the ones who can explain the unique challenges they face, devise a solution, and outline their own capabilities and support needs. Mshighati went on to highlight the importance of governmental stakeholders, detailing the stages of how a program can be evaluated and supported at different governmental levels. He also mentioned the importance of engaging civil society organizations, as they can assist in key ways at various implementation levels. As an example, he described Pathfinder’s efforts to bridge the work of family planning initiatives and conservation programs in the East African region, underscoring the necessity of bringing these groups together to discuss potential solutions to their intersecting issues.

Ayenekulu discussed how multi-sectoral programming can address the needs of diverse populations of adolescents and young people; consequently, awọn types of sectors that should be included will differ based on these unique needs. She explained that the difference between the needs and priorities of youth populations, and the strategies that collaborating sectors must use to address these needs, highlights the necessity of centering young people in program design and implementation. Padilla discussed the importance of involving private-sector stakeholders, who have a vested interest in promoting AYSRH due to its positive impacts on the employability of young people. She shared a story of integrating AYSRH into a program that aimed to help young people find employment in Mexico, and how it was surprising yet understandable that industry employers were interested in supporting this initiative. Padilla explained that these sectors are motivated to promote the health and wellbeing of youth and adolescents, as addressing these larger systemic problems can also improve their employment rates.

Are there theories of behavior change that can inform multi-sectoral programming? How are we capturing knowledge learned through the implementation of this type of programming?

Wo ni bayi: 33:59

Mshighati discussed how consistent and collaborative learning sessions can enhance the collective knowledge gained through multi-sectoral programming. In his experience, the learning process is informed by continuously monitoring the programming and evaluating its effectiveness; he described how evaluation mechanisms must be jointly developed during the design phase in order to benefit all stakeholders. Mshighati explained that, in these learning sessions, program leaders meet with community members, government officials, and civil society stakeholders to analyze knowledge gained, evaluate key outcomes, assess any emerging challenges, and devise ways to address them.

“Much of what is needed to achieve certain SRH outcomes, either in women or in youth and adolescents, had to do with behavior change through communication.”

Josaphat Mshighati

What are some of the theories around systems thinking that have informed your work in multi-sectoral programming?

Wo ni bayi: 37:52

Padilla spoke about the importance of understanding the greater context of issues facing youth and adolescents, explaining how program leaders can draw on stakeholders existing in that context in order to improve their program’s outcomes. She described the necessity of identifying key local stakeholders who may wish to be included in AYSRH programming and discovering their potential incentives to collaborate. Padilla went on to explain how, nipasẹ creating a map of the resources and organizations that exist around the target population, program developers can engage with stakeholders outside of their sector and work together to combat larger systemic issues. She also mentioned the necessity of tailoring one’s language to their stakeholder audience, as communication is key to ensuring buy-in and enhancing collaboration.

“This approach has given us the opportunity to not only tackle a specific issue but also to look at different actors that are not in our own sector that might be super strategic to involve in our work; it can help us provide better outcomes and better services for our young people.”

Andrea Padilla

How do we evaluate the efficacy of partnerships between sectors? What are the ways that we can hold ourselves accountable as partners?

Wo ni bayi: 43:32

Ayenekulu emphasized that strong coordination mechanisms are critical for efficient and effective multi-sectoral approaches. These mechanisms must include clearly outlined roles and responsibilities for each partner, and a strong accountability framework must also be built into the coordination mechanism. Ayenekulu explained that an accountability framework can exist in several forms, such as formal evaluations. She also highlighted the need for clear, tangible, and measurable goals and consistent data collection regarding whether or not goals were met.

“For a multi-sectoral approach to work, there must be a strong coordination mechanism, and it should be supported by clear lines of roles and responsibilities.”

Metsehate Ayenekulu

In addition to the collaborative design of programming, do you think that joint implementation is necessary within multi-sectoral programming? What do you find has worked the best in your experience?

Wo ni bayi: 46:49

Mshighati discussed the reasons why joint implementation has more benefits than simply joint planning or parallel implementation (where programs are simultaneously implemented but not integrated). He explained that the efficacy of joint implementation depends on the strength of the relationship between collaborating sectors; if the relationship isn’t sufficiently strong, each partner runs the risk of not adequately integrating the others’ work into their own. If this happens, two jointly designed programs may be implemented alongside each other without efficiently maximizing their potential for coordination. Mshighati suggested that joint implementation can facilitate a culture where everyone understands how their different forms of work intersect and complement each other, which can translate into improved program outcomes and better use of limited resources.

“In joint implementation, you build a culture of every person understanding the work of others.”

Josaphat Mshighati

Nipa “Asopọmọra Awọn ibaraẹnisọrọ”

"Nsopọ Awọn ibaraẹnisọrọ” jẹ jara ti a ṣe ni pataki fun awọn oludari ọdọ ati awọn ọdọ, ti gbalejo nipa FP2030 ati Aseyori Imọ. Ifihan awọn akori marun, pẹlu mẹrin si marun awọn ibaraẹnisọrọ fun module, jara yii ṣafihan iwoye ni kikun si Awọn ọdọ ati Ilera ibisi ọdọ (AYRH) awọn koko-ọrọ pẹlu Ọdọmọkunrin ati Idagbasoke Ọdọmọkunrin; Iwọn ati Iṣiro ti Awọn Eto AYRH; Ibaṣepọ Awọn ọdọ ti o nilari; Ilọsiwaju Itọju Iṣọkan fun Awọn ọdọ; ati awọn 4 P’s of influential players in AYRH. Ti o ba ti lọ si eyikeyi awọn igba, lẹhinna o mọ pe awọn wọnyi kii ṣe awọn webinars aṣoju rẹ. Awọn ibaraẹnisọrọ ibaraenisepo wọnyi jẹ ẹya awọn agbohunsoke bọtini ati iwuri ọrọ sisọ. A gba awọn olukopa niyanju lati fi awọn ibeere silẹ ṣaaju ati lakoko awọn ibaraẹnisọrọ.

Wa karun ati ik jara, “Awọn aṣa ti n yọ jade ati Awọn ọna Iyipada ni AYSRH,” bẹrẹ ni Oṣu Kẹwa 14, 2021, ati ti a we soke lori Kọkànlá Oṣù 18, 2021.

Fẹ lati Gba Mu Lori Ibaraẹnisọrọ Iṣaaju?

Wa akọkọ jara, eyi ti o ran lati Keje 2020 nipasẹ Kẹsán 2020, lojutu lori oye ipilẹ ti idagbasoke ọdọ ati ilera. Wa keji jara, eyi ti o ran lati Kọkànlá Oṣù 2020 nipasẹ December 2020, lojutu lori awọn oludasiṣẹ pataki lati mu ilọsiwaju ilera ibisi ọdọ. Wa kẹta jara ran lati March 2021 si Kẹrin 2021 ati idojukọ lori ọna idahun ọdọ si awọn iṣẹ SRH. Wa kẹrin jara bẹrẹ ni Okudu 2021 o si pari ni Oṣu Kẹjọ 2021 ati idojukọ lori de ọdọ awọn olugbe pataki ọdọ ni AYSRH. O le wo awọn igbasilẹ (wa ni English ati French) ati kika awọn akojọpọ ibaraẹnisọrọ lati yẹ.

Nsopọ Awọn ibaraẹnisọrọ
Jill Litman

Agbaye Partnerships Akọṣẹ, FP2030

Jill Litman jẹ oga ni University of California, Berkeley keko Health Public. Laarin aaye yii, o ni ife gidigidi nipa ilera iya ati idajo ibisi. O jẹ Akọṣẹ Awọn ajọṣepọ Agbaye ti FP2030 fun isubu ti 2021, ṣe iranlọwọ fun ẹgbẹ Awọn ipilẹṣẹ Agbaye ni iṣẹ wọn pẹlu Awọn aaye Idojukọ ọdọ ati awọn iṣẹ ṣiṣe miiran fun 2030 iyipada.

6.2K wiwo
Pin nipasẹ
Daakọ ọna asopọ